Supreme court case on gay rights

WASHINGTON—As the LGBTQ+ community continues to face discriminatory legislation across the country, there are also a number of active court cases making their way through the court system that try to either roll endorse these anti-equality laws or expand LGBTQ+ protections. In addition, anti-equality state attorneys general and anti-equality organizations are challenging non-discrimination rules issued by the federal government. Ranging from healthcare to education, these cases address a variety of rights and will hold an important impact on the state of equality for LGBTQ+ Americans.

In order to track these cases and the consequences of their decisions, this background document provides topline information while also illustrating the disturbing range of attacks facing LGBTQ+ people.

Health Care

Bans on Health Care for Gender diverse People

• Bans on health look after for transgender youth own been passed in 24 states across the state, with 17 being challenged in state or feder
  

  A decade after the Supreme Court’s Obergefell decision, marriage equality endures risky terrain

  Milestones — especially in decades — usually call for celebration. The 10th anniversary of Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court case that made same-sex marriage legal nationwide, is different. There’s a sense of unease as state and federal lawmakers, as well as several judges, take steps that could transport the issue help to the Supreme Court, which could undermine or overturn existing and future same-sex marriages and weaken additional anti-discrimination protections.

  In its nearly quarter century of existence, the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Rule has been on the front lines of LGBTQ rights. Its amicus concise in the Obergefell case was instrumental, with Justice Anthony Kennedy citing statistics from the institute on the number of same-sex couples raising children as a deciding factor in the landmark decision.

  “There were claims that allowing queer couples to join would somehow devalue or diminish marriage for everyone, including different-sex couples,&r

  IntroductionTwo Supreme Court decisions involving male lover rights, one decade apart, hold left a lot of people wondering just where the regulation now stands with respect to the right to engage in homosexual conduct.

  The Court first considered the matter in the case of Bowers v Hardwick, a challenge to a Georgia regulation authorizing criminal penalties for persons found guilty of sodomy.  Although the Georgia law applied both to heterosexual and homosexual sodomy, the Supreme Court chose to consider only the constitutionality of applying the law to gay sodomy.  (Michael Hardwick, who sought to enjoin enforcement of the Georgia law, had been charged with sodomy after a police officer discovered him in bed with another man.  Charges were later dropped.)  In Bowers, the Court ruled 5 to 4 that the Due Process Clause "right of privacy" recognized in cases such Griswold and Roe does not prevent the criminalization of homosexual conduct between consenting adults.  One of the five members of the majority, Justice Powell, later described his vote in the case a

  7 Supreme Court Cases That shaped LGBTQ Rights

  The LGBTQ movement in America dates back at least as far as the s, when the first documented gay rights organization was founded. The Society for Human Rights only survived for about a year before it was disbanded in , but its mark was left on our country.

  Increased visibility and activism of LGBTQ individuals since the s has helped the movement make progress on multiple fronts. Just as advocates fought their battle in American culture, they also did so in the courts. Here, we look at a not many cases that have shaped LGBTQ rights in America and celebrate some of the milestones of the movement.

  1) One, Inc. v. Olesen

  The first Supreme Court case to consider LGBTQ rights had to execute with the First Amendment right to freedom of speech. A publisher released ONE: The Homosexual Magazine, America’s first widely-distributed magazine for queer readers. Not long after publication began, its August and October editions were seized by Los Angeles postmaster Otto Olesen for supposedly violating obscenity laws. In its decision, the Supre