Bbs gay
THE GAY & LESBIAN BBS LIST Collection
Description
This .zip holds copies of THE GAY & LESBIAN BBS LIST, a monthly listing of active Gay & Lesbian BBSes. The list was maintained by Risqilly, sysop of Risqilly BBS and/or Eric Blair, sysop of S-Tek BBS in Montreal, from to August (when the closing edition was published). Though many of the BBSes listed are based in North America, the list did include at various points in its existence a varied list of BBSes housed outside North America.
Currently, the .ZIP archive holds 8 years of the list, from August to August However, there are significant gaps in some years, and this file may be updated to include new copies when they become available.
Creator
Risqilly and Eric Blair
Source
Date
August to August
Format
.ZIP archive containing Plain Message Files
Language
American English
Gay Crew members
I think the point is
In , when Gene first idea up "Star Trek" he had a woman as second in command.
In , when it first got to breeze, he had minorities as both walk-on token roles, but more importantly, he had them up front where it counted. He has an Asian pilot, an African communications officer, and though not technically a minority, he had a Russian navigator in the middle of the Cold War.
In , "Star Trek" was saying the thinking of the day was not that of the future. That an all Caucasian space was not what tomorrow would hold.
I still dont grasp how he was able to get away with that in those days. As in these days, 40 years later, there is "controversy" whenever two same-sex attracted characters so much as kiss.
A lot of folks have said not to equate the fight for equality that races and women went through in the 60s with the same battle today for people of other sexual orientations. For the life of me, I cant see why not to do so.
Any group struggling for respect and equality is as any other group before who has done
First off, I don't consider so, but that is something to look into. As per the second question, usually, for some reason, they are given a dishonorable discharge from their service, and not allowed to have any recompense for it. At least, this is what I've scan in Time and Reader's Digest. So far, I reflect that although there have been suits filed, none of them have actually been successful.Alex Moon wrote:I've been looking around online, but have seen nothing about this. Does anyone comprehend if there contain been any MoH recipients who were later found to be gay?
Secondly, what would the reaction be in this day in age if a soldier who was awarded the honor was found to be gay?
~ver
Hot Pants à la Zaia | BotM Lord Monkey Mod OOK!
SDNC | WG | GDC | ACPATHNTDWATGODW | GALE | ISARMA | CotK:[mew]
Formerly verilon
R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero, 09 October - 13 November
Gay Hollywood
Vorta said:
I myself love both genders, but never told anyone until now. Am I ashamed of that? Nope. I just dont see the point in divulging that detail about myself.
Click to expand
But my ask then is, "Why wouldntyou?" What is it thats stopping you from organism open about that, if its not shame?
bluedana said:
Honestly, I contain no patience with forcibly or subtly "outing" anyone. I cant think of a more personal, sacrosanct issue than ones sexual identity.
Click to expand
I thoroughly disagree. To my mind, ones sexual self is nothing special, an entirely neutral fact about ones self that is no more noteworthy than eye colour or shoe size. To give it any more weight than that is to form more of a massive deal of it than it actually is.
While I would not help forcing someone out of the closet against their will (unless they are actively working against LGBT interests while in there), my argument would simply be as above - "Why wouldntyou come out?" Why not acknowledge